Definition 1 (Norm). Let X be a vector space. A norm on X is a function ∥⋅∥:X→[0,+∞) such that, for all x,y∈X and α∈R: (i)∥x∥=0 if and only if x=0; (ii)∥αx∥=∣α∣∥x∥; (iii)∥x+y∥≤∥x∥+∥y∥, the triangular inequality, drawn in Figure 1.
A norm ∥⋅∥ induces on X the distance d:X×X→[0,+∞) given by d(x,y)=∥x−y∥, and (X,d) is a metric space.
Figure 1. The drawing of Definition 1 (iii), an instance in the plane: two vectors x and y, their sum x+y and the vector y drawn again from the end of x. Dashed, the segment from the end of y to the end of x+y.
Remark 2 (Normed space). If ∥⋅∥ is a norm on a vector space X, the couple (X,∥⋅∥) is called a normed space. Balls, open, closed and compact sets in X and continuous functions f:X→R are then well defined: they are those of the metric space (X,d) of Definition 1.
Remark 3. Let (X,∥⋅∥) be a normed space. Then the norm ∥⋅∥:X→[0,+∞) is continuous.
Proof (complete). The norm satisfies the reverse triangle inequality∥x∥−∥y∥≤∥x−y∥ for all x,y∈X. Let (xn)⊂X and x0∈X be such that xn→x0 in X. This means d(xn,x0)→0, that is, ∥xn−x0∥→0. We want to prove that ∥xn∥→∥x0∥, and the reverse triangle inequality gives it: ∥xn∥−∥x0∥≤∥xn−x0∥→0.■
Definition 4 (Cauchy sequence, Banach space). Let (X,∥⋅∥) be a normed space. (i) A sequence (xn) of points of X is Cauchy if for every ε>0 there exists N such that ∥xn−xm∥<ε for all n,m≥N. Here ∥xn−xm∥=d(xn,xm). (ii) If every Cauchy sequence converges in X, we say that (X,∥⋅∥) is a Banach space.
Norms on Euclidean space and on continuous functions#
Example 5.(i) Let N be a positive integer. The Euclidean space(RN,∣⋅∣) is a Banach space, where
Notice that ∣⋅∣=∥⋅∥2. The spaces (RN,∥⋅∥p) are Banach spaces.
(iii) Let −∞<a<b<+∞, and let C([a,b]) be the set of the continuous functions on [a,b], with
∥u∥∞=[a,b]esssup∣u∣=[a,b]max∣u∣for u∈C([a,b]).
The essential supremum, with respect to the Lebesgue measure, is a maximum because u is continuous. The space (C([a,b]),∥⋅∥∞) is a Banach space.
In Example 5 with N=2, the balls B1(0), of radius 1 and centre 0, are drawn in Figure 2 for the norms ∣⋅∣,∥⋅∥∞ and ∥⋅∥1, and in Figure 3 for ∥⋅∥p. If v1,v2>0, then ∥(v1,v2)∥1=v1+v2. Hence the points of this quadrant with ∥(v1,v2)∥1≤1 are those with v1+v2≤1.
B1(0) for |·|
B1(0) for ‖·‖∞
B1(0) for ‖·‖1
Figure 2. The drawing of Example 5 with N=2: the balls B1(0) for the norms ∣⋅∣,∥⋅∥∞ and ∥⋅∥1, with the corners of the last two.
Figure 3. The drawing of Example 5 for ∥⋅∥p with N=2: the ball B1(0) for the p of the slider and, dashed, the balls for ∥⋅∥1 and ∥⋅∥∞ of Figure 2.
For the idea behind Example 5 (iii), which is not a proof, let (un)⊂C([a,b]) and u:[a,b]→R. If un→u in C([a,b]), this means ∥un−u∥∞→0, that is, limn→∞max[a,b]∣un−u∣=0. That is, un→u uniformly, and therefore u is continuous.
Definition 6 (Convergent series). Let (X,∥⋅∥) be a normed space and let (xn) be a sequence of points of X. For every N let
SN=n=0∑Nxn.
If there exists S∈X such that SN→S in X, that is, ∥SN−S∥→0, we say that the series ∑nxnconverges to S in X.
Proposition 7 (Criterion to distinguish Banach spaces). Let (X,∥⋅∥) be a normed space. Then (X,∥⋅∥) is a Banach space if and only if, for every sequence (xn) of points of X such that ∑n∥xn∥<+∞, the series ∑nxn converges in X.
Example 8. Let p∈[1,+∞]. (i) Examples of the spaces Lp(X,M,μ) are Lp(RN),Lp((a,b)) and so on, with the Lebesgue measure.
(ii) Let ℓp:=Lp(N,P(N),μ#), where μ# is the counting measure on the subsets of N. The elements x∈ℓp are sequences, written x=(x(k)), where x(k)∈R is the k-th value of the sequence x. Indeed, the only set of counting measure zero is the empty set, so each class of ℓp contains exactly one function from N to R. For p<+∞ the ℓp norm of x∈ℓp is
∥x∥p=(k=0∑∞∣x(k)∣p)p1.
A sequence in ℓp is written (xn)⊂ℓp, with xn∈ℓp for every n, and the k-th value of xn is xn(k)∈R.
Definition 9 (Conjugate exponent). Let p∈[1,+∞]. The conjugate of p is the exponent p′ such that: (i) if p∈(1,+∞), then p′∈(1,+∞) and 1/p+1/p′=1; (ii) if p=1, then p′=+∞; (iii) if p=+∞, then p′=1.
Remark 10.(i) The exponent p′ is the conjugate of p if and only if p is the conjugate of p′. (ii) If p=2, then p′=2.
Lemma 11 (Young inequality). Let 1<p<+∞, let p′ be its conjugate, and let a,b∈R with a,b>0. Then
ab≤pap+p′bp′.
Proof (complete). The logarithm is concave, as in Figure 4, that is, for all α,β>0 and t∈(0,1),
log(tα+(1−t)β)≥tlogα+(1−t)logβ.
Since 1/p+1/p′=1, concavity applies with t=1/p and 1−t=1/p′. With α=ap and β=bp′ it gives
Applying the exponential function to both sides gives elog(ap/p+bp′/p′)≥elog(ab), which is the claim. ■
Figure 4. The drawing of the proof of Lemma 11: the graph of log and its chord between the points with abscissas α=ap and β=bp′, for the a,b and p of the sliders. Above the abscissa tα+(1−t)β with t=1/p, the chord is at height log(ab) and the graph at height log(ap/p+bp′/p′).
Proposition 12 (Hölder inequality). Let (X,M,μ) be a measure space, let p∈[1,+∞] with conjugate p′, and let u,v:X→R be measurable. Then
∫X∣uv∣dμ≤∥u∥p∥v∥p′,
where ∥u∥p and ∥v∥p′ are given by the formulas of Definitions 17 and 19 of the sixth post and may equal +∞, and the product follows Definition 5 of the first post.
Proof (complete). Without loss of generality ∥u∥p>0 and ∥v∥p′>0. Otherwise one of the two functions is 0 almost everywhere, so that ∣uv∣=0 almost everywhere, and the inequality reads 0≤0.
Without loss of generality ∥u∥p<+∞ and ∥v∥p′<+∞. Otherwise the right-hand side is +∞, and the inequality is true.
Without loss of generality ∥u∥p=∥v∥p′=1. To reduce to this case, for u and v as above let
u~=∥u∥pu,v~=∥v∥p′v.
Then ∥u~∥p=∥v~∥p′=1, and the inequality for functions with norms equal to 1 gives
where the inequality is the Young inequality, Lemma 11, at every point of X. Indeed, at a point x where u(x)=0 or v(x)=0 the pointwise inequality holds because its left-hand side is 0. If p=1, then p′=+∞ and
∫X∣uv∣dμ=∫X∣u∣∣v∣dμ≤∥v∥∞∫X∣u∣dμ=∥v∥∞∥u∥1,
since ∣v∣≤∥v∥∞ almost everywhere. Indeed, for p=+∞ we have p′=1, and the case p=1 applies with u and v exchanged. ■
Corollary 13. Let (X,M,μ) be a measure space such that μ(X)<+∞, and let 1≤p≤q≤+∞. Then Lq⊂Lp.
Proof (complete). Let f∈Lq. We apply the Hölder inequality, Proposition 12, to u=∣f∣p and v=1, with the exponent q/p≥1 and its conjugate r. Here 1/r=1−1/(q/p)=1−p/q. This gives
since ∣u+v∣≤∣u∣+∣v∣. The conjugate of p satisfies 1/p′=1−1/p=(p−1)/p, that is, p′=p/(p−1), and the Hölder inequality, Proposition 12, applied to each of the last two integrals gives
which is equivalent to ∥u+v∥p≤∥u∥p+∥v∥p. Indeed, ∥u+v∥p<+∞ because u+v∈Lp by Remark 18 (i) of the sixth post, and for ∥u+v∥p>0 one divides by ∥u+v∥pp−1.■
Theorem 17 (Riesz–Fischer). Let (X,M,μ) be a measure space and let 1≤p≤+∞. Then Lp(X,M,μ) is a Banach space.
Proof (sketch). Only the case 1≤p<+∞ is treated, with the criterion of Proposition 7. Let (fn)⊂Lp be such that ∑n∥fn∥p<+∞, and let
SN=n=0∑Nfn.
The goal is to show that (SN) converges in Lp. Define
gN(x)=n=0∑N∣fn(x)∣,
so that gN≥0 and gN∈Lp. Since gN+1≥gN almost everywhere, we can define g(x)=limN→∞gN(x) almost everywhere. For every N, by the Minkowski inequality, Proposition 16,
because g∈Lp, so that the series of the fn(x) is an absolutely converging series. Hence at almost every x the series of the fn(x) converges, that is, the limit limN→∞SN(x) exists. Thus (SN) converges almost everywhere, and we call S(x):=limN→∞SN(x) at almost every x.
By the dominated convergence theorem in Lp,Theorem 8 of the seventh post, SN→S in Lp.■
Remark 18. Let (X,M,μ) be a measure space, let p∈[1,+∞], let (fn)⊂Lp and let f:X→R be measurable. If fn→f in Lp, that is, ∥fn−f∥p→0, then f∈Lp.
Proof (complete). The sequence (fn) is Cauchy in Lp. For all n and m,
∥fn−fm∥p≤∥fn−f∥p+∥f−fm∥p,
where the first term on the right tends to 0 as n→∞ and the second as m→∞. Also, for every ε>0 there exists N such that ∥fn−f∥p<ε/2 for every n≥N. Hence, if n,m≥N, then ∥fn−f∥p+∥f−fm∥p≤ε.
By the Riesz–Fischer theorem, Theorem 17, there exists g∈Lp such that fn→g in Lp. By the uniqueness of limits, Remark 12 of the seventh post, g=f almost everywhere, hence f∈Lp.■
Example 19. Let −∞<a<b<+∞ and consider the space W1,p((a,b)) with p∈[1,+∞]. For f∈W1,p((a,b)) let
∥f∥W1,p:=∥f∥p+∥w∥p,
where w is the weak derivative of f. Then (W1,p((a,b)),∥⋅∥W1,p) is a Banach space.
Remark 20. Since λ((a,b))<+∞,Corollary 13 gives Lp((a,b))⊂L1((a,b)) for every p≥1. Hence
W1,p((a,b))⊂W1,1((a,b))=AC([a,b]),
where AC([a,b]) is the set of the absolutely continuous functions on [a,b]. That is, every function of W1,p((a,b)) has an absolutely continuous representative.
Example 21. Let a,b and p be as in Example 19. The set
W01,p((a,b))={f∈W1,p((a,b)):f(a)=f(b)=0}
is a subspace of W1,p((a,b)). In detail, f(a) and f(b) are the values at a and b of the absolutely continuous representative of f of Remark 20. (i) The space (W01,p((a,b)),∥⋅∥W1,p) is a Banach space.
(ii) The space (W01,p((a,b)),∥⋅∥W01,p) is a Banach space, where for f∈W01,p((a,b))
∥f∥W01,p:=∥w∥p,
with w the weak derivative of f. In fact, w=f′ almost everywhere, since f∈AC([a,b]).