Alessandro Palliccia

Real and Functional Analysis

Banach spaces, the Hölder inequality and the completeness of LpL^p

1,376 words, , published

Functional analysis studies infinite-dimensional vector spaces (Brezis).

Normed and Banach spaces

Definition 1 (Norm). Let XX be a vector space. A norm on XX is a function ∥⋅∥ ⁣:X→[0,+∞){\|\cdot\| \colon X \to [0, +\infty)} such that, for all x,y∈X{x, y \in X} and α∈R:{\alpha \in \mathbb{R}{:}}
(i) ∥x∥=0{\|x\| = 0} if and only if x=0;{x = 0;}
(ii) ∥αx∥=∣α∣ ∥x∥;{\|\alpha x\| = |\alpha| \, \|x\|;}
(iii) ∥x+y∥≤∥x∥+∥y∥,{\|x + y\| \le \|x\| + \|y\|,} the triangular inequality, drawn in Figure 1.
A norm ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| induces on XX the distance d ⁣:X×X→[0,+∞){d \colon X \times X \to [0, +\infty)} given by d(x,y)=∥x−y∥,{d(x, y) = \|x - y\|,} and (X,d)(X, d) is a metric space.

xyx + yy

Figure 1. The drawing of Definition 1 (iii), an instance in the plane: two vectors xx and y,{y,} their sum x+y{x + y} and the vector yy drawn again from the end of x.{x.} Dashed, the segment from the end of yy to the end of x+y.{x + y.}

Remark 2 (Normed space). If ∥⋅∥\|\cdot\| is a norm on a vector space X,{X,} the couple (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \|\cdot\|) is called a normed space. Balls, open, closed and compact sets in XX and continuous functions f ⁣:X→R{f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} are then well defined: they are those of the metric space (X,d)(X, d) of Definition 1.

Remark 3. Let (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \|\cdot\|) be a normed space. Then the norm ∥⋅∥ ⁣:X→[0,+∞){\|\cdot\| \colon X \to [0, +\infty)} is continuous.

Proof (complete). The norm satisfies the reverse triangle inequality ∣ ∥x∥−∥y∥ ∣≤∥x−y∥{\bigl|\, \|x\| - \|y\| \,\bigr| \le \|x - y\|} for all x,y∈X.{x, y \in X.} Let (xn)⊂X{(x_n) \subset X} and x0∈X{x_0 \in X} be such that xn→x0{x_n \to x_0} in X.{X.} This means d(xn,x0)→0,{d(x_n, x_0) \to 0,} that is, ∥xn−x0∥→0.{\|x_n - x_0\| \to 0.} We want to prove that ∥xn∥→∥x0∥,{\|x_n\| \to \|x_0\|,} and the reverse triangle inequality gives it: ∣ ∥xn∥−∥x0∥ ∣≤∥xn−x0∥→0.{\bigl|\, \|x_n\| - \|x_0\| \,\bigr| \le \|x_n - x_0\| \to 0.} ■\blacksquare

Definition 4 (Cauchy sequence, Banach space). Let (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \|\cdot\|) be a normed space.
(i) A sequence (xn)(x_n) of points of XX is Cauchy if for every ε>0{\varepsilon > 0} there exists NN such that ∥xn−xm∥<ε{\|x_n - x_m\| < \varepsilon} for all n,m≥N.{n, m \ge N.} Here ∥xn−xm∥=d(xn,xm).{\|x_n - x_m\| = d(x_n, x_m).}
(ii) If every Cauchy sequence converges in X,{X,} we say that (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \|\cdot\|) is a Banach space.

Norms on Euclidean space and on continuous functions

Example 5. (i) Let NN be a positive integer. The Euclidean space (RN,∣⋅∣){(\mathbb{R}^N, |\cdot|)} is a Banach space, where

∣(v1,…,vN)∣=∑i=1N(vi)2.|(v_1, \dots, v_N)| = \sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{N} (v_i)^2}.

(ii) For p∈[1,+∞),{p \in [1, +\infty),} consider (RN,∥⋅∥p),{(\mathbb{R}^N, \|\cdot\|_p),} where

∥(v1,…,vN)∥p=(∑i=1N∣vi∣p)1p,and also∥(v1,…,vN)∥∞=max⁡i=1,…,N∣vi∣.\|(v_1, \dots, v_N)\|_p = \Big( \sum_{i=1}^{N} |v_i|^p \Big)^{\frac{1}{p}}, \qquad \text{and also} \qquad \|(v_1, \dots, v_N)\|_\infty = \max_{i = 1, \dots, N} |v_i|.

Notice that ∣⋅∣=∥⋅∥2.{|\cdot| = \|\cdot\|_2.} The spaces (RN,∥⋅∥p){(\mathbb{R}^N, \|\cdot\|_p)} are Banach spaces.

(iii) Let −∞<a<b<+∞,{-\infty < a < b < +\infty,} and let C([a,b])C([a, b]) be the set of the continuous functions on [a,b],{[a, b],} with

∥u∥∞=ess sup⁡[a,b]∣u∣=max⁡[a,b]∣u∣for u∈C([a,b]).\|u\|_\infty = \operatorname*{ess\,sup}_{[a, b]} |u| = \max_{[a, b]} |u| \qquad \text{for } u \in C([a, b]).

The essential supremum, with respect to the Lebesgue measure, is a maximum because uu is continuous. The space (C([a,b]),∥⋅∥∞){(C([a, b]), \|\cdot\|_\infty)} is a Banach space.

In Example 5 with N=2,{N = 2,} the balls B1(0),{B_1(0),} of radius 1 and centre 0,{0,} are drawn in Figure 2 for the norms ∣⋅∣,{|\cdot|,} ∥⋅∥∞\|\cdot\|_\infty and ∥⋅∥1,{\|\cdot\|_1,} and in Figure 3 for ∥⋅∥p.{\|\cdot\|_p.} If v1,v2>0,{v_1, v_2 > 0,} then ∥(v1,v2)∥1=v1+v2.{\|(v_1, v_2)\|_1 = v_1 + v_2.} Hence the points of this quadrant with ∥(v1,v2)∥1≤1{\|(v_1, v_2)\|_1 \le 1} are those with v1+v2≤1.{v_1 + v_2 \le 1.}

B1(0) for |·|

(−1, 1)(1, 1)(−1, −1)(1, −1)

B1(0) for ‖·‖∞

(0, 1)(−1, 0)(1, 0)(0, −1)

B1(0) for ‖·‖1

Figure 2. The drawing of Example 5 with N=2:{N = 2{:}} the balls B1(0)B_1(0) for the norms ∣⋅∣,{|\cdot|,} ∥⋅∥∞\|\cdot\|_\infty and ∥⋅∥1,{\|\cdot\|_1,} with the corners of the last two.

B1(0) for ‖·‖p

Figure 3. The drawing of Example 5 for ∥⋅∥p\|\cdot\|_p with N=2:{N = 2{:}} the ball B1(0)B_1(0) for the pp of the slider and, dashed, the balls for ∥⋅∥1\|\cdot\|_1 and ∥⋅∥∞\|\cdot\|_\infty of Figure 2.

For the idea behind Example 5 (iii), which is not a proof, let (un)⊂C([a,b]){(u_n) \subset C([a, b])} and u ⁣:[a,b]→R.{u \colon [a, b] \to \mathbb{R}.} If un→u{u_n \to u} in C([a,b]),{C([a, b]),} this means ∥un−u∥∞→0,{\|u_n - u\|_\infty \to 0,} that is, lim⁡n→∞max⁡[a,b]∣un−u∣=0.{\lim_{n \to \infty} \max_{[a, b]} |u_n - u| = 0.} That is, un→u{u_n \to u} uniformly, and therefore uu is continuous.

Convergent series

Definition 6 (Convergent series). Let (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \|\cdot\|) be a normed space and let (xn)(x_n) be a sequence of points of X.{X.} For every NN let

SN=∑n=0Nxn.S_N = \sum_{n=0}^{N} x_n.

If there exists S∈X{S \in X} such that SN→S{S_N \to S} in X,{X,} that is, ∥SN−S∥→0,{\|S_N - S\| \to 0,} we say that the series ∑nxn\sum_n x_n converges to SS in X.{X.}

Proposition 7 (Criterion to distinguish Banach spaces). Let (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \|\cdot\|) be a normed space. Then (X,∥⋅∥)(X, \|\cdot\|) is a Banach space if and only if, for every sequence (xn)(x_n) of points of XX such that ∑n∥xn∥<+∞,{\sum_n \|x_n\| < +\infty,} the series ∑nxn\sum_n x_n converges in X.{X.}

The LpL^p spaces (part 2)

The spaces Lp(X,M,μ)L^p(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu) of Definitions 14 and 19 of the sixth post are now studied with the notions of Definitions 1 and 4.

The spaces ℓp\ell^p

Example 8. Let p∈[1,+∞].{p \in [1, +\infty].}
(i) Examples of the spaces Lp(X,M,μ)L^p(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu) are Lp(RN),{L^p(\mathbb{R}^N),} Lp((a,b))L^p((a, b)) and so on, with the Lebesgue measure.

(ii) Let ℓp:=Lp(N,P(N),μ#),{\ell^p := L^p(\mathbb{N}, \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}), \mu_\#),} where μ#\mu_\# is the counting measure on the subsets of N.{\mathbb{N}.} The elements x∈ℓp{x \in \ell^p} are sequences, written x=(x(k)),{x = (x^{(k)}),} where x(k)∈R{x^{(k)} \in \mathbb{R}} is the kk-th value of the sequence x.{x.} Indeed, the only set of counting measure zero is the empty set, so each class of ℓp\ell^p contains exactly one function from N\mathbb{N} to R.{\mathbb{R}.} For p<+∞{p < +\infty} the ℓp\ell^p norm of x∈ℓp{x \in \ell^p} is

∥x∥p=(∑k=0∞∣x(k)∣p)1p.\|x\|_p = \Big( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} |x^{(k)}|^p \Big)^{\frac{1}{p}}.

A sequence in ℓp\ell^p is written (xn)⊂ℓp,{(x_n) \subset \ell^p,} with xn∈ℓp{x_n \in \ell^p} for every n,{n,} and the kk-th value of xnx_n is xn(k)∈R.{x_n^{(k)} \in \mathbb{R}.}

Conjugate exponents and the Hölder inequality

Definition 9 (Conjugate exponent). Let p∈[1,+∞].{p \in [1, +\infty].} The conjugate of pp is the exponent p′p' such that:
(i) if p∈(1,+∞),{p \in (1, +\infty),} then p′∈(1,+∞){p' \in (1, +\infty)} and 1/p+1/p′=1;{1/p + 1/p' = 1;}
(ii) if p=1,{p = 1,} then p′=+∞;{p' = +\infty;}
(iii) if p=+∞,{p = +\infty,} then p′=1.{p' = 1.}

Remark 10. (i) The exponent p′p' is the conjugate of pp if and only if pp is the conjugate of p′.{p'.}
(ii) If p=2,{p = 2,} then p′=2.{p' = 2.}

Lemma 11 (Young inequality). Let 1<p<+∞,{1 < p < +\infty,} let p′p' be its conjugate, and let a,b∈R{a, b \in \mathbb{R}} with a,b>0.{a, b > 0.} Then

ab≤app+bp′p′.ab \le \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^{p'}}{p'}.

Proof (complete). The logarithm is concave, as in Figure 4, that is, for all α,β>0{\alpha, \beta > 0} and t∈(0,1),{t \in (0, 1),}

log⁡(tα+(1−t)β)≥tlog⁡α+(1−t)log⁡β.\log\big( t\alpha + (1 - t)\beta \big) \ge t \log \alpha + (1 - t) \log \beta.

Since 1/p+1/p′=1,{1/p + 1/p' = 1,} concavity applies with t=1/p{t = 1/p} and 1−t=1/p′.{1 - t = 1/p'.} With α=ap{\alpha = a^p} and β=bp′{\beta = b^{p'}} it gives

log⁡(app+bp′p′)≥1plog⁡(ap)+1p′log⁡(bp′)=log⁡a+log⁡b=log⁡(ab).\log\Big( \frac{a^p}{p} + \frac{b^{p'}}{p'} \Big) \ge \frac{1}{p} \log(a^p) + \frac{1}{p'} \log(b^{p'}) = \log a + \log b = \log(ab).

Applying the exponential function to both sides gives elog⁡(ap/p+bp′/p′)≥elog⁡(ab),{e^{\log(a^p/p + b^{p'}/p')} \ge e^{\log(ab)},} which is the claim. ■\blacksquare

xαβlog(ab)log(ap/p + bp′/p′)log(x)

Figure 4. The drawing of the proof of Lemma 11: the graph of log⁡\log and its chord between the points with abscissas α=ap{\alpha = a^p} and β=bp′,{\beta = b^{p'},} for the a,{a,} bb and pp of the sliders. Above the abscissa tα+(1−t)β{t\alpha + (1 - t)\beta} with t=1/p,{t = 1/p,} the chord is at height log⁡(ab)\log(ab) and the graph at height log⁡(ap/p+bp′/p′).{\log(a^p/p + b^{p'}/p').}

Proposition 12 (Hölder inequality). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, let p∈[1,+∞]{p \in [1, +\infty]} with conjugate p′,{p',} and let u,v ⁣:X→R{u, v \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable. Then

∫X∣uv∣ dμ≤∥u∥p ∥v∥p′,\int_X |uv| \, d\mu \le \|u\|_p \, \|v\|_{p'},

where ∥u∥p\|u\|_p and ∥v∥p′\|v\|_{p'} are given by the formulas of Definitions 17 and 19 of the sixth post and may equal +∞,{+\infty,} and the product follows Definition 5 of the first post.

Proof (complete). Without loss of generality ∥u∥p>0{\|u\|_p > 0} and ∥v∥p′>0.{\|v\|_{p'} > 0.} Otherwise one of the two functions is 00 almost everywhere, so that ∣uv∣=0{|uv| = 0} almost everywhere, and the inequality reads 0≤0.{0 \le 0.}

Without loss of generality ∥u∥p<+∞{\|u\|_p < +\infty} and ∥v∥p′<+∞.{\|v\|_{p'} < +\infty.} Otherwise the right-hand side is +∞,{+\infty,} and the inequality is true.

Without loss of generality ∥u∥p=∥v∥p′=1.{\|u\|_p = \|v\|_{p'} = 1.} To reduce to this case, for uu and vv as above let

u~=u∥u∥p,v~=v∥v∥p′.\tilde{u} = \frac{u}{\|u\|_p}, \qquad \tilde{v} = \frac{v}{\|v\|_{p'}}.

Then ∥u~∥p=∥v~∥p′=1,{\|\tilde{u}\|_p = \|\tilde{v}\|_{p'} = 1,} and the inequality for functions with norms equal to 11 gives

∫X∣u~v~∣ dμ≤∥u~∥p ∥v~∥p′=1,∫X∣u~v~∣ dμ=1∥u∥p ∥v∥p′∫X∣uv∣ dμ.\begin{aligned} \int_X |\tilde{u} \tilde{v}| \, d\mu &\le \|\tilde{u}\|_p \, \|\tilde{v}\|_{p'} = 1, \\ \int_X |\tilde{u} \tilde{v}| \, d\mu &= \frac{1}{\|u\|_p \, \|v\|_{p'}} \int_X |uv| \, d\mu. \end{aligned}

From now on ∥u∥p=∥v∥p′=1.{\|u\|_p = \|v\|_{p'} = 1.} If 1<p<+∞,{1 < p < +\infty,} then

∫X∣uv∣ dμ≤∫X(∣u∣pp+∣v∣p′p′) dμ=1p∥u∥pp+1p′∥v∥p′p′=1p+1p′=1=∥u∥p ∥v∥p′,\begin{aligned} \int_X |uv| \, d\mu &\le \int_X \Big( \frac{|u|^p}{p} + \frac{|v|^{p'}}{p'} \Big) \, d\mu = \frac{1}{p} \|u\|_p^p + \frac{1}{p'} \|v\|_{p'}^{p'} \\ &= \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{p'} = 1 = \|u\|_p \, \|v\|_{p'}, \end{aligned}

where the inequality is the Young inequality, Lemma 11, at every point of X.{X.} Indeed, at a point xx where u(x)=0{u(x) = 0} or v(x)=0{v(x) = 0} the pointwise inequality holds because its left-hand side is 0.{0.} If p=1,{p = 1,} then p′=+∞{p' = +\infty} and

∫X∣uv∣ dμ=∫X∣u∣ ∣v∣ dμ≤∥v∥∞∫X∣u∣ dμ=∥v∥∞ ∥u∥1,\int_X |uv| \, d\mu = \int_X |u| \, |v| \, d\mu \le \|v\|_\infty \int_X |u| \, d\mu = \|v\|_\infty \, \|u\|_1,

since ∣v∣≤∥v∥∞{|v| \le \|v\|_\infty} almost everywhere. Indeed, for p=+∞{p = +\infty} we have p′=1,{p' = 1,} and the case p=1{p = 1} applies with uu and vv exchanged. ■\blacksquare

Inclusions and interpolation

Corollary 13. Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space such that μ(X)<+∞,{\mu(X) < +\infty,} and let 1≤p≤q≤+∞.{1 \le p \le q \le +\infty.} Then Lq⊂Lp.{L^q \subset L^p.}

Proof (complete). Let f∈Lq.{f \in L^q.} We apply the Hölder inequality, Proposition 12, to u=∣f∣p{u = |f|^p} and v=1,{v = 1,} with the exponent q/p≥1{q/p \ge 1} and its conjugate r.{r.} Here 1/r=1−1/(q/p)=1−p/q.{1/r = 1 - 1/(q/p) = 1 - p/q.} This gives

∫X∣f∣p dμ=∫X∣f∣p⋅1 dμ≤(∫X∣f∣pqp dμ)pq(∫X1r dμ)1r=∥f∥qp μ(X)1r<+∞,\begin{aligned} \int_X |f|^p \, d\mu = \int_X |f|^p \cdot 1 \, d\mu &\le \Big( \int_X |f|^{p \frac{q}{p}} \, d\mu \Big)^{\frac{p}{q}} \Big( \int_X 1^r \, d\mu \Big)^{\frac{1}{r}} \\ &= \|f\|_q^p \, \mu(X)^{\frac{1}{r}} < +\infty, \end{aligned}

since ∥f∥q<+∞{\|f\|_q < +\infty} and μ(X)<+∞.{\mu(X) < +\infty.} In detail, for p=q{p = q} there is nothing to prove, and for q=+∞{q = +\infty} Proposition 12 gives in the same way ∫X∣f∣p dμ≤∥f∥∞p μ(X).{\int_X |f|^p \, d\mu \le \|f\|_\infty^p \, \mu(X).} ■\blacksquare

Remark 14. For all 1≤p≤q≤+∞,{1 \le p \le q \le +\infty,} ℓ1⊂ℓp⊂ℓq⊂ℓ∞.{\ell^1 \subset \ell^p \subset \ell^q \subset \ell^\infty.}

Corollary 15 (Interpolation). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, let 1≤p≤r≤q≤+∞,{1 \le p \le r \le q \le +\infty,} and let u ⁣:X→R{u \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable. Then

∥u∥r≤∥u∥pα ∥u∥q1−αwith1r=αp+1−αq,\|u\|_r \le \|u\|_p^{\alpha} \, \|u\|_q^{1 - \alpha} \qquad \text{with} \qquad \frac{1}{r} = \frac{\alpha}{p} + \frac{1 - \alpha}{q},

where α∈[0,1],{\alpha \in [0, 1],} 1/(+∞):=0{1/(+\infty) := 0} and the norms are as in Proposition 12. In particular, Lp∩Lq⊂Lr.{L^p \cap L^q \subset L^r.}

The Minkowski inequality and the Riesz–Fischer theorem

Proposition 16 (Minkowski inequality). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, let 1≤p≤+∞{1 \le p \le +\infty} and let u,v∈Lp.{u, v \in L^p.} Then

∥u+v∥p≤∥u∥p+∥v∥p.\|u + v\|_p \le \|u\|_p + \|v\|_p.

In particular, (Lp(X),∥⋅∥p){(L^p(X), \|\cdot\|_p)} is a normed space.

Proof (sketch). The case p=+∞{p = +\infty} is not proved. If p=1,{p = 1,} then

∫X∣u+v∣ dμ≤∫X(∣u∣+∣v∣) dμ=∥u∥1+∥v∥1.\int_X |u + v| \, d\mu \le \int_X (|u| + |v|) \, d\mu = \|u\|_1 + \|v\|_1.

Let 1<p<+∞.{1 < p < +\infty.} Then

∥u+v∥pp=∫X∣u+v∣p dμ=∫X∣u+v∣ ∣u+v∣p−1 dμ≤∫X∣u∣ ∣u+v∣p−1 dμ+∫X∣v∣ ∣u+v∣p−1 dμ,\begin{aligned} \|u + v\|_p^p &= \int_X |u + v|^p \, d\mu = \int_X |u + v| \, |u + v|^{p-1} \, d\mu \\ &\le \int_X |u| \, |u + v|^{p-1} \, d\mu + \int_X |v| \, |u + v|^{p-1} \, d\mu, \end{aligned}

since ∣u+v∣≤∣u∣+∣v∣.{|u + v| \le |u| + |v|.} The conjugate of pp satisfies 1/p′=1−1/p=(p−1)/p,{1/p' = 1 - 1/p = (p - 1)/p,} that is, p′=p/(p−1),{p' = p/(p - 1),} and the Hölder inequality, Proposition 12, applied to each of the last two integrals gives

∫X∣u∣ ∣u+v∣p−1 dμ+∫X∣v∣ ∣u+v∣p−1 dμ≤∥u∥p(∫X(∣u+v∣p−1)p′ dμ)1p′+∥v∥p(∫X(∣u+v∣p−1)p′ dμ)1p′=(∥u∥p+∥v∥p)(∫X∣u+v∣p dμ)p−1p=(∥u∥p+∥v∥p) ∥u+v∥pp−1,\begin{aligned} &\int_X |u| \, |u + v|^{p-1} \, d\mu + \int_X |v| \, |u + v|^{p-1} \, d\mu \\ &\quad \le \|u\|_p \Big( \int_X \big( |u + v|^{p-1} \big)^{p'} \, d\mu \Big)^{\frac{1}{p'}} + \|v\|_p \Big( \int_X \big( |u + v|^{p-1} \big)^{p'} \, d\mu \Big)^{\frac{1}{p'}} \\ &\quad = \big( \|u\|_p + \|v\|_p \big) \Big( \int_X |u + v|^p \, d\mu \Big)^{\frac{p-1}{p}} \\ &\quad = \big( \|u\|_p + \|v\|_p \big) \, \|u + v\|_p^{p-1}, \end{aligned}

where (p−1)p′=p.{(p - 1) p' = p.} All in all,

∥u+v∥pp≤(∥u∥p+∥v∥p) ∥u+v∥pp−1,\|u + v\|_p^p \le \big( \|u\|_p + \|v\|_p \big) \, \|u + v\|_p^{p-1},

which is equivalent to ∥u+v∥p≤∥u∥p+∥v∥p.{\|u + v\|_p \le \|u\|_p + \|v\|_p.} Indeed, ∥u+v∥p<+∞{\|u + v\|_p < +\infty} because u+v∈Lp{u + v \in L^p} by Remark 18 (i) of the sixth post, and for ∥u+v∥p>0{\|u + v\|_p > 0} one divides by ∥u+v∥pp−1.{\|u + v\|_p^{p-1}.} ■\blacksquare

Theorem 17 (Riesz–Fischer). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space and let 1≤p≤+∞.{1 \le p \le +\infty.} Then Lp(X,M,μ)L^p(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu) is a Banach space.

Proof (sketch). Only the case 1≤p<+∞{1 \le p < +\infty} is treated, with the criterion of Proposition 7. Let (fn)⊂Lp{(f_n) \subset L^p} be such that ∑n∥fn∥p<+∞,{\sum_n \|f_n\|_p < +\infty,} and let

SN=∑n=0Nfn.S_N = \sum_{n=0}^{N} f_n.

The goal is to show that (SN)(S_N) converges in Lp.{L^p.} Define

gN(x)=∑n=0N∣fn(x)∣,g_N(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{N} |f_n(x)|,

so that gN≥0{g_N \ge 0} and gN∈Lp.{g_N \in L^p.} Since gN+1≥gN{g_{N+1} \ge g_N} almost everywhere, we can define g(x)=lim⁡N→∞gN(x){g(x) = \lim_{N \to \infty} g_N(x)} almost everywhere. For every N,{N,} by the Minkowski inequality, Proposition 16,

∥gN∥p=∥∑n=0N∣fn∣∥p≤∑n=0N∥ ∣fn∣ ∥p=∑n=0N∥fn∥p≤∑n=0∞∥fn∥p<+∞.\|g_N\|_p = \Bigl\| \sum_{n=0}^{N} |f_n| \Bigr\|_p \le \sum_{n=0}^{N} \bigl\|\, |f_n| \,\bigr\|_p = \sum_{n=0}^{N} \|f_n\|_p \le \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \|f_n\|_p < +\infty.

By the monotone convergence theorem, Theorem 4 of the sixth post, and by this bound,

∫X∣g∣p dμ=lim⁡N→+∞∫X∣gN∣p dμ=lim⁡N→+∞∥gN∥pp≤lim⁡N→+∞(∑n=0∞∥fn∥p)p<+∞,\begin{aligned} \int_X |g|^p \, d\mu &= \lim_{N \to +\infty} \int_X |g_N|^p \, d\mu = \lim_{N \to +\infty} \|g_N\|_p^p \\ &\le \lim_{N \to +\infty} \Big( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \|f_n\|_p \Big)^p < +\infty, \end{aligned}

hence g∈Lp.{g \in L^p.} Now, at almost every x∈X,{x \in X,}

∣SN(x)∣=∣∑n=0Nfn(x)∣≤∑n=0N∣fn(x)∣=gN(x)≤g(x),|S_N(x)| = \Big| \sum_{n=0}^{N} f_n(x) \Big| \le \sum_{n=0}^{N} |f_n(x)| = g_N(x) \le g(x),

with g∈Lp.{g \in L^p.} Moreover, at almost every x,{x,}

g(x)=lim⁡N→∞gN(x)=∑n=0∞∣fn(x)∣<+∞,g(x) = \lim_{N \to \infty} g_N(x) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} |f_n(x)| < +\infty,

because g∈Lp,{g \in L^p,} so that the series of the fn(x)f_n(x) is an absolutely converging series. Hence at almost every xx the series of the fn(x)f_n(x) converges, that is, the limit lim⁡N→∞SN(x){\lim_{N \to \infty} S_N(x)} exists. Thus (SN)(S_N) converges almost everywhere, and we call S(x):=lim⁡N→∞SN(x){S(x) := \lim_{N \to \infty} S_N(x)} at almost every x.{x.}

By the dominated convergence theorem in Lp,{L^p,} Theorem 8 of the seventh post, SN→S{S_N \to S} in Lp.{L^p.} ■\blacksquare

Remark 18. Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, let p∈[1,+∞],{p \in [1, +\infty],} let (fn)⊂Lp{(f_n) \subset L^p} and let f ⁣:X→R{f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable. If fn→f{f_n \to f} in Lp,{L^p,} that is, ∥fn−f∥p→0,{\|f_n - f\|_p \to 0,} then f∈Lp.{f \in L^p.}

Proof (complete). The sequence (fn)(f_n) is Cauchy in Lp.{L^p.} For all nn and m,{m,}

∥fn−fm∥p≤∥fn−f∥p+∥f−fm∥p,\|f_n - f_m\|_p \le \|f_n - f\|_p + \|f - f_m\|_p,

where the first term on the right tends to 00 as n→∞{n \to \infty} and the second as m→∞.{m \to \infty.} Also, for every ε>0{\varepsilon > 0} there exists NN such that ∥fn−f∥p<ε/2{\|f_n - f\|_p < \varepsilon/2} for every n≥N.{n \ge N.} Hence, if n,m≥N,{n, m \ge N,} then ∥fn−f∥p+∥f−fm∥p≤ε.{\|f_n - f\|_p + \|f - f_m\|_p \le \varepsilon.}

By the Riesz–Fischer theorem, Theorem 17, there exists g∈Lp{g \in L^p} such that fn→g{f_n \to g} in Lp.{L^p.} By the uniqueness of limits, Remark 12 of the seventh post, g=f{g = f} almost everywhere, hence f∈Lp.{f \in L^p.} ■\blacksquare

The spaces W1,p((a,b))W^{1,p}((a, b))

Example 19. Let −∞<a<b<+∞{-\infty < a < b < +\infty} and consider the space W1,p((a,b))W^{1,p}((a, b)) with p∈[1,+∞].{p \in [1, +\infty].} For f∈W1,p((a,b)){f \in W^{1,p}((a, b))} let

∥f∥W1,p:=∥f∥p+∥w∥p,\|f\|_{W^{1,p}} := \|f\|_p + \|w\|_p,

where ww is the weak derivative of f.{f.} Then (W1,p((a,b)),∥⋅∥W1,p){(W^{1,p}((a, b)), \|\cdot\|_{W^{1,p}})} is a Banach space.

Remark 20. Since λ((a,b))<+∞,{\lambda((a, b)) < +\infty,} Corollary 13 gives Lp((a,b))⊂L1((a,b)){L^p((a, b)) \subset L^1((a, b))} for every p≥1.{p \ge 1.} Hence

W1,p((a,b))⊂W1,1((a,b))=AC([a,b]),W^{1,p}((a, b)) \subset W^{1,1}((a, b)) = \mathrm{AC}([a, b]),

where AC([a,b])\mathrm{AC}([a, b]) is the set of the absolutely continuous functions on [a,b].{[a, b].} That is, every function of W1,p((a,b))W^{1,p}((a, b)) has an absolutely continuous representative.

Example 21. Let a,{a,} bb and pp be as in Example 19. The set

W01,p((a,b))={f∈W1,p((a,b)):f(a)=f(b)=0}W_0^{1,p}((a, b)) = \{ f \in W^{1,p}((a, b)) : f(a) = f(b) = 0 \}

is a subspace of W1,p((a,b)).{W^{1,p}((a, b)).} In detail, f(a)f(a) and f(b)f(b) are the values at aa and bb of the absolutely continuous representative of ff of Remark 20.
(i) The space (W01,p((a,b)),∥⋅∥W1,p){(W_0^{1,p}((a, b)), \|\cdot\|_{W^{1,p}})} is a Banach space.

(ii) The space (W01,p((a,b)),∥⋅∥W01,p){(W_0^{1,p}((a, b)), \|\cdot\|_{W_0^{1,p}})} is a Banach space, where for f∈W01,p((a,b)){f \in W_0^{1,p}((a, b))}

∥f∥W01,p:=∥w∥p,\|f\|_{W_0^{1,p}} := \|w\|_p,

with ww the weak derivative of f.{f.} In fact, w=f′{w = f'} almost everywhere, since f∈AC([a,b]).{f \in \mathrm{AC}([a, b]).}