Alessandro Palliccia

Real and Functional Analysis

Notions of convergence of measurable functions

1,390 words, , published

A sequence of measurable functions can converge to a measurable function in several senses.

Notions of convergence

Definition 1 (Notions of convergence). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, and let fn ⁣:X→R,{f_n \colon X \to \mathbb{R},} for every n,{n,} and f ⁣:X→R{f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable.
(i) We say that fn→f{f_n \to f} pointwise if lim⁡n→∞fn(x)=f(x){\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) = f(x)} for every x∈X.{x \in X.}
(ii) We say that fn→f{f_n \to f} uniformly if lim⁡n→+∞sup⁡x∈X∣fn(x)−f(x)∣=0.{\lim_{n \to +\infty} \sup_{x \in X} |f_n(x) - f(x)| = 0.}
(iii) We say that fn→f{f_n \to f} almost everywhere if lim⁡n→+∞fn(x)=f(x){\lim_{n \to +\infty} f_n(x) = f(x)} for almost every x∈X.{x \in X.}

(iv) Let p∈[1,+∞].{p \in [1, +\infty].} We say that fn→f{f_n \to f} in Lp(X)L^p(X) if lim⁡n→+∞∥fn−f∥p=0,{\lim_{n \to +\infty} \|f_n - f\|_p = 0,} that is, if

lim⁡n→∞∫X∣fn−f∣p dμ=0when p<+∞,lim⁡n→∞ess sup⁡x∈X∣fn(x)−f(x)∣=0when p=+∞.\begin{aligned} &\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_X |f_n - f|^p \, d\mu = 0 && \text{when } p < +\infty, \\ &\lim_{n \to \infty} \operatorname*{ess\,sup}_{x \in X} |f_n(x) - f(x)| = 0 && \text{when } p = +\infty. \end{aligned}

(v) We say that fn→f{f_n \to f} in measure if, for every ε>0,{\varepsilon > 0,}

lim⁡n→∞μ({x∈X:∣fn(x)−f(x)∣>ε})=0.\lim_{n \to \infty} \mu(\{ x \in X : |f_n(x) - f(x)| > \varepsilon \}) = 0.

The set in Definition 1 (v) is also written {∣fn−f∣>ε}.{\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}.}

Remark 2. The notions (iii), (iv) and (v) of Definition 1 make sense for (fn)⊂Lp{(f_n) \subset L^p} and f∈Lp.{f \in L^p.}

Remark 3 (Obvious implications). Let (fn)(f_n) and ff be as in Definition 1. The notions of convergence of Definition 1 are related as in Figure 1. Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence, which implies convergence almost everywhere, and neither implication can be reversed. Uniform convergence implies convergence in L∞,{L^\infty,} which does not imply uniform convergence, and convergence in L∞L^\infty implies convergence almost everywhere and convergence in measure.

Convergence in L∞L^\infty implies convergence almost everywhere: ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣≤∥fn−f∥∞{|f_n(x) - f(x)| \le \|f_n - f\|_\infty} for almost every x∈X,{x \in X,} and lim⁡n→∞∥fn−f∥∞=0.{\lim_{n \to \infty} \|f_n - f\|_\infty = 0.} Convergence in L∞L^\infty implies convergence in measure. Let ε>0{\varepsilon > 0} and consider the set {∣fn−f∣>ε}.{\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}.} There exists NN such that ∥fn−f∥∞≤ε/2{\|f_n - f\|_\infty \le \varepsilon/2} for every n≥N.{n \ge N.} Hence μ({∣fn−f∣>ε})=0{\mu(\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}) = 0} for every n≥N.{n \ge N.}

fnfuniformlyfnfpointwisefnfalmost everywherefnfin L∞fnfin measure

Figure 1. The drawing of Remark 3: the five notions of convergence of fnf_n to f,{f,} a double arrow for each implication and a crossed double arrow for each implication that does not hold.

Typewriter sequence

Example 4 (Typewriter sequence). On [0,1]{[0, 1]} with the Lebesgue measure λ,{\lambda,} consider the sequence (fn)n≥1{(f_n)_{n \ge 1}} of characteristic functions drawn in Figure 2. Its first terms are f1=χ[0,1/2]{f_1 = \chi_{[0, 1/2]}} and f2=χ[1/2,1],{f_2 = \chi_{[1/2, 1]},} then the characteristic functions f3,…,f6{f_3, \dots, f_6} of [0,1/4],{[0, 1/4],} [1/4,1/2],{[1/4, 1/2],} [1/2,3/4][1/2, 3/4] and [3/4,1],{[3/4, 1],} then f7=χ[0,1/8],{f_7 = \chi_{[0, 1/8]},} and so on. In detail, the terms come in groups: for every k≥1{k \ge 1} the kk-th group is made of the characteristic functions of the intervals [j/2k,(j+1)/2k]{[j/2^k, (j + 1)/2^k]} with j=0,1,…,2k−1,{j = 0, 1, \dots, 2^k - 1,} in this order.

f101/21f201/21f3f4f5f6f7f8f9f10f11f12f13f14

Figure 2. The drawing of Example 4: the graphs of the functions f1f_1 to f14,{f_{14},} in rows of 2, 4 and 8, each on its own copy of [0,1].{[0, 1].} The functions f1,{f_1,} f3f_3 and f7,{f_7,} circled, are the first terms of the subsequence that converges to 00 almost everywhere.

For every x∈[0,1],{x \in [0, 1],} lim‾⁡n→∞fn(x)=0{\varliminf_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) = 0} and lim‾⁡n→∞fn(x)=1.{\varlimsup_{n \to \infty} f_n(x) = 1.} In fact, for every xx and every NN there exist n1,n2≥N{n_1, n_2 \ge N} such that fn1(x)=0{f_{n_1}(x) = 0} and fn2(x)=1.{f_{n_2}(x) = 1.} Indeed, for every k≥2{k \ge 2} the point xx lies in at least one and in at most two of the intervals of the kk-th group. Hence the limit lim⁡n→∞fn(x){\lim_{n \to \infty} f_n(x)} exists at no x,{x,} and (fn)(f_n) does not converge almost everywhere.

The circled functions of Figure 2 form a subsequence (fnk),{(f_{n_k}),} made of the characteristic functions of [0,1/2],{[0, 1/2],} [0,1/4],{[0, 1/4],} [0,1/8],{[0, 1/8],} and so on, such that fnk→0{f_{n_k} \to 0} almost everywhere on [0,1].{[0, 1].} Finally, fn→0{f_n \to 0} in L1([0,1]).{L^1([0, 1]).}

Convergence in measure

Theorem 5 (Almost everywhere versus in measure). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, and let fn ⁣:X→R,{f_n \colon X \to \mathbb{R},} for every n,{n,} and f ⁣:X→R{f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable.
(1) If μ(X)<+∞{\mu(X) < +\infty} and fn→f{f_n \to f} almost everywhere, then fn→f{f_n \to f} in measure.
(2) If fn→f{f_n \to f} in measure, then there exists a subsequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) such that fnk→f{f_{n_k} \to f} almost everywhere.

Theorem 5 (2) gives the convergence almost everywhere of a subsequence: the typewriter sequence of Example 4 converges to 00 in measure, but (fn)(f_n) itself does not converge almost everywhere. In Theorem 5 (1) the assumption μ(X)<+∞{\mu(X) < +\infty} is needed. Otherwise, take (R,L(R),λ){(\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}), \lambda)} and fn=χ[n,n+1],{f_n = \chi_{[n, n+1]},} as in Figure 3: then fn→0{f_n \to 0} almost everywhere, but (fn)(f_n) does not converge to 00 in measure. In fact, λ({∣fn∣>1/2})=λ([n,n+1])=1{\lambda(\{ |f_n| > 1/2 \}) = \lambda([n, n + 1]) = 1} for every n.{n.}

11/2fnnn + 1

Figure 3. The function fn=χ[n,n+1]{f_n = \chi_{[n, n+1]}} on R,{\mathbb{R},} the dashed level 1/2,{1/2,} and the set {∣fn∣>1/2}=[n,n+1]{\{ |f_n| > 1/2 \} = [n, n + 1]} hatched on the axis. The slider sets n.{n.}

Theorem 6 (LpL^p implies measure). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, let fn ⁣:X→R,{f_n \colon X \to \mathbb{R},} for every n,{n,} and f ⁣:X→R{f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable, and let p∈[1,+∞].{p \in [1, +\infty].} If fn→f{f_n \to f} in Lp,{L^p,} then fn→f{f_n \to f} in measure. In particular, by Theorem 5 (2), there exists a subsequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) such that fnk→f{f_{n_k} \to f} almost everywhere.

Proof (complete). The case p=+∞{p = +\infty} is in Remark 3. Let p∈[1,+∞){p \in [1, +\infty)} and let ε>0.{\varepsilon > 0.} Then

(∫X∣fn−f∣p dμ)1p≥(∫{∣fn−f∣>ε}∣fn−f∣p dμ)1p≥(∫{∣fn−f∣>ε}εp dμ)1p=(εp μ({∣fn−f∣>ε}))1p=ε μ({∣fn−f∣>ε})1p,\begin{aligned} \biggl( \int_X |f_n - f|^p \, d\mu \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} &\ge \biggl( \int_{\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}} |f_n - f|^p \, d\mu \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \\ &\ge \biggl( \int_{\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}} \varepsilon^p \, d\mu \biggr)^{\frac{1}{p}} \\ &= \big( \varepsilon^p \, \mu(\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}) \big)^{\frac{1}{p}} \\ &= \varepsilon \, \mu(\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \})^{\frac{1}{p}}, \end{aligned}

where both inequalities are monotonicity, (3) and (2) of Remark 4 of the fifth post. Hence

μ({∣fn−f∣>ε})≤(1ε)p∥fn−f∥pp,\mu(\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}) \le \Big( \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \Big)^p \|f_n - f\|_p^p,

where ∥fn−f∥pp→0{\|f_n - f\|_p^p \to 0} as n→+∞{n \to +\infty} by assumption. Therefore

lim⁡n→∞μ({∣fn−f∣>ε})=0.■\lim_{n \to \infty} \mu(\{ |f_n - f| > \varepsilon \}) = 0. \tag*{$\blacksquare$}

Remark 7. On (R,L(R),λ){(\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}), \lambda)} let fn=nχ[0,1/n]{f_n = n \chi_{[0, 1/n]}} for every n≥1,{n \ge 1,} as in Figure 4. Then fn→0{f_n \to 0} almost everywhere, fn↛0{f_n \nrightarrow 0} in L1,{L^1,} and fn→0{f_n \to 0} in measure.

In fact, ∫R∣fn∣ dλ=1{\int_{\mathbb{R}} |f_n| \, d\lambda = 1} for every n.{n.} Moreover, for every ε>0{\varepsilon > 0} we have {∣fn∣>ε}=[0,1/n]{\{ |f_n| > \varepsilon \} = [0, 1/n]} for every nn sufficiently big, hence λ({∣fn∣>ε})=1/n→0.{\lambda(\{ |f_n| > \varepsilon \}) = 1/n \to 0.}

n1/n0εfn

Figure 4. The drawing of Remark 7: the function fn=nχ[0,1/n],{f_n = n \chi_{[0, 1/n]},} the region of area 11 under its graph, the dashed level ε,{\varepsilon,} and the set {∣fn∣>ε}{\{ |f_n| > \varepsilon \}} hatched on the axis. The sliders set nn and ε.{\varepsilon.}

Convergence in LpL^p

Theorem 8 (Dominated convergence in LpL^p). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, let fn ⁣:X→R,{f_n \colon X \to \mathbb{R},} for every n,{n,} and f ⁣:X→R{f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable, and let p∈[1,+∞).{p \in [1, +\infty).} Suppose that fn→f{f_n \to f} almost everywhere and that there exists g∈Lp{g \in L^p} such that ∣fn∣≤g{|f_n| \le g} almost everywhere for every n.{n.} Then f∈Lp{f \in L^p} and fn→f{f_n \to f} in Lp.{L^p.}

Remark 9. Theorem 8 does not hold with p=+∞.{p = +\infty.} On (R,L(R),λ){(\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}), \lambda)} let fn=χ[0,1−1/n]{f_n = \chi_{[0, 1 - 1/n]}} for every n≥1,{n \ge 1,} as in Figure 5. Then fn→χ[0,1]{f_n \to \chi_{[0, 1]}} almost everywhere and ∣fn∣≤1∈L∞,{|f_n| \le 1 \in L^\infty,} but fn↛χ[0,1]{f_n \nrightarrow \chi_{[0, 1]}} in L∞.{L^\infty.}

In fact, ∣χ[0,1](x)−fn(x)∣=χ(1−1/n,1](x){|\chi_{[0, 1]}(x) - f_n(x)| = \chi_{(1 - 1/n, 1]}(x)} for every x∈R,{x \in \mathbb{R},} hence

∥fn−χ[0,1]∥∞=∥χ(1−1/n,1]∥∞=1for every n,\|f_n - \chi_{[0, 1]}\|_\infty = \|\chi_{(1 - 1/n, 1]}\|_\infty = 1 \qquad \text{for every } n,

so ∥fn−χ[0,1]∥∞{\|f_n - \chi_{[0, 1]}\|_\infty} does not tend to 00 as n→∞.{n \to \infty.}

fnχ[0, 1]χ(1 − 1/n, 1]01 − 1/n101 − 1/n1

Figure 5. The drawing of Remark 9: above, the function fn=χ[0,1−1/n]{f_n = \chi_{[0, 1 - 1/n]}} and, dashed, its limit χ[0,1];{\chi_{[0, 1]};} below, their difference ∣χ[0,1]−fn∣=χ(1−1/n,1].{|\chi_{[0, 1]} - f_n| = \chi_{(1 - 1/n, 1]}.} The slider sets n.{n.}

Remark 10 (Reverse dominated convergence in LpL^p). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space and let fn,f ⁣:X→R{f_n, f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable, for every n.{n.} Let p∈[1,+∞]{p \in [1, +\infty]} and (fn)⊂Lp.{(f_n) \subset L^p.} If fn→f{f_n \to f} in Lp,{L^p,} then f∈Lp{f \in L^p} and there exist a subsequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) and g∈Lp{g \in L^p} such that:
(i) fnk→f{f_{n_k} \to f} almost everywhere;
(ii) ∣fnk∣≤g{|f_{n_k}| \le g} almost everywhere for every k.{k.}

Proposition 11 (Almost everywhere and norms imply LpL^p). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space, let fn,f ⁣:X→R{f_n, f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable, for every n,{n,} and let p∈[1,+∞).{p \in [1, +\infty).} Suppose that fn→f{f_n \to f} almost everywhere, that fn,f∈Lp{f_n, f \in L^p} and that lim⁡n→∞∥fn∥p=∥f∥p.{\lim_{n \to \infty} \|f_n\|_p = \|f\|_p.} Then fn→f{f_n \to f} in Lp.{L^p.}

Proof (complete). For every x∈X,{x \in X,}

∣fn(x)−f(x)∣p≤2p−1(∣fn(x)∣p+∣f(x)∣p).|f_n(x) - f(x)|^p \le 2^{p-1} \big( |f_n(x)|^p + |f(x)|^p \big).

Hence the functions

gn:=2p−1(∣fn∣p+∣f∣p)−∣fn−f∣pg_n := 2^{p-1} \big( |f_n|^p + |f|^p \big) - |f_n - f|^p

satisfy gn≥0,{g_n \ge 0,} and at almost every x∈X{x \in X}

lim⁡n→+∞gn(x)=2p−1(∣f(x)∣p+∣f(x)∣p)−0=2p∣f(x)∣p.\lim_{n \to +\infty} g_n(x) = 2^{p-1} \big( |f(x)|^p + |f(x)|^p \big) - 0 = 2^p |f(x)|^p.

By Fatou’s lemma, Theorem 1 of the previous post,

2p∥f∥pp=∫X2p∣f∣p dμ≤lim‾⁡n∫Xgn dμ=lim‾⁡n∫X(2p−1(∣fn∣p+∣f∣p)−∣fn−f∣p) dμ=lim‾⁡n(2p−1∥fn∥pp+2p−1∥f∥pp−∥fn−f∥pp).\begin{aligned} 2^p \|f\|_p^p = \int_X 2^p |f|^p \, d\mu &\le \varliminf_n \int_X g_n \, d\mu \\ &= \varliminf_n \int_X \Big( 2^{p-1} \big( |f_n|^p + |f|^p \big) - |f_n - f|^p \Big) \, d\mu \\ &= \varliminf_n \Big( 2^{p-1} \|f_n\|_p^p + 2^{p-1} \|f\|_p^p - \|f_n - f\|_p^p \Big). \end{aligned}

The last expression equals

(lim‾⁡n2p−1∥fn∥pp)+2p−1∥f∥pp−lim‾⁡n∥fn−f∥pp=2p−1∥f∥pp+2p−1∥f∥pp−lim‾⁡n∥fn−f∥pp=2p∥f∥pp−lim‾⁡n∥fn−f∥pp,\begin{aligned} &\bigl( \varliminf_n 2^{p-1} \|f_n\|_p^p \bigr) + 2^{p-1} \|f\|_p^p - \varlimsup_n \|f_n - f\|_p^p \\ &\quad = 2^{p-1} \|f\|_p^p + 2^{p-1} \|f\|_p^p - \varlimsup_n \|f_n - f\|_p^p \\ &\quad = 2^p \|f\|_p^p - \varlimsup_n \|f_n - f\|_p^p, \end{aligned}

where the second equality is the hypothesis lim⁡n∥fn∥p=∥f∥p.{\lim_n \|f_n\|_p = \|f\|_p.} Indeed, the first equality holds because, by the same hypothesis, the sequence 2p−1∥fn∥pp{2^{p-1} \|f_n\|_p^p} converges.

Comparing the first line of the first display with the last line of the second, lim‾⁡n∥fn−f∥pp≤0.{\varlimsup_n \|f_n - f\|_p^p \le 0.} Indeed, 2p∥f∥pp{2^p \|f\|_p^p} is finite because f∈Lp,{f \in L^p,} so it can be subtracted from both sides. Since ∥fn−f∥pp≥0{\|f_n - f\|_p^p \ge 0} for every n,{n,} it follows that lim⁡n∥fn−f∥p=0.{\lim_n \|f_n - f\|_p = 0.} ■\blacksquare

Uniqueness of limits

Remark 12 (Uniqueness of limits). Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space and let fn,f,g ⁣:X→R{f_n, f, g \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable, for every n.{n.} Suppose that fn→f{f_n \to f} with respect to a notion of convergence N1N_1 and fn→g{f_n \to g} with respect to a notion of convergence N2,{N_2,} both among the notions of Definition 1. Then f=g{f = g} almost everywhere.

Proof (complete). Every notion of Definition 1 implies the convergence almost everywhere of a subsequence, so there exists a subsequence (fnk)(f_{n_k}) such that fnk→f{f_{n_k} \to f} almost everywhere. Indeed, uniform and pointwise convergence imply convergence almost everywhere by Remark 3, and convergence in LpL^p or in measure gives a subsequence that converges almost everywhere by Theorem 6 and by Theorem 5 (2).

Also fn→g{f_n \to g} with respect to N2,{N_2,} hence fnk→g{f_{n_k} \to g} with respect to N2,{N_2,} and therefore there exists a subsequence (fnkl)(f_{n_{k_l}}) of (fnk)(f_{n_k}) such that fnkl→g{f_{n_{k_l}} \to g} almost everywhere. Moreover, fnk→f{f_{n_k} \to f} almost everywhere, hence fnkl→f{f_{n_{k_l}} \to f} almost everywhere. Therefore, at almost every x∈X,{x \in X,}

∣f(x)−g(x)∣=lim⁡l→∞∣fnkl(x)−fnkl(x)∣=0.|f(x) - g(x)| = \lim_{l \to \infty} |f_{n_{k_l}}(x) - f_{n_{k_l}}(x)| = 0.

Indeed, at such xx the numbers fnkl(x)f_{n_{k_l}}(x) tend both to f(x)f(x) and to g(x).{g(x).} Hence f=g{f = g} almost everywhere. ■\blacksquare

Exercises

The sequence cos⁡(xn)\cos(x^n)

Example 13. Let fn(x)=cos⁡(xn){f_n(x) = \cos(x^n)} for x∈[0,1],{x \in [0, 1],} with the Lebesgue measure λ\lambda on [0,1],{[0, 1],} as in Figure 6. Does (fn)(f_n) converge almost everywhere, in L1,{L^1,} in measure?

011xnfncos(1)

Figure 6. The drawing of Example 13 for the nn of the slider: the graph of xn,{x^n,} which ends at the point (1,1),{(1, 1),} the graph of fn(x)=cos⁡(xn),{f_n(x) = \cos(x^n),} which ends at (1,cos⁡(1)),{(1, \cos(1)),} and, dashed, the constant 1.{1.}

As n→∞,{n \to \infty,} xn→0{x^n \to 0} for x∈[0,1){x \in [0, 1)} and xn→1{x^n \to 1} for x=1,{x = 1,} pointwise. Hence, pointwise for every x∈[0,1],{x \in [0, 1],}

fn(x)=cos⁡(xn)→n→∞{1if x∈[0,1),cos⁡(1)if x=1.f_n(x) = \cos(x^n) \xrightarrow[n \to \infty]{} \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } x \in [0, 1), \\ \cos(1) & \text{if } x = 1. \end{cases}

Therefore fn→f{f_n \to f} almost everywhere, where f(x)=1{f(x) = 1} for every x∈[0,1].{x \in [0, 1].} Moreover, ∣fn∣=∣cos⁡(xn)∣≤1{|f_n| = |\cos(x^n)| \le 1} for every x∈[0,1].{x \in [0, 1].} Hence ∣fn∣≤f{|f_n| \le f} for every xx and f∈L1((0,1)).{f \in L^1((0, 1)).} By the dominated convergence theorem, Theorem 8 with p=1,{p = 1,} fn→f{f_n \to f} in L1((0,1)).{L^1((0, 1)).} Finally, fn→f{f_n \to f} in measure by Theorem 6.

The sequence n−αχ[0,n]n^{-\alpha} \chi_{[0, n]}

Example 14. Let α>0{\alpha > 0} and, on (R,L(R),λ),{(\mathbb{R}, \mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}), \lambda),} let fn=(1/nα)χ[0,n]{f_n = (1/n^\alpha) \chi_{[0, n]}} for every n≥1,{n \ge 1,} as in Figure 7. Find all α>0{\alpha > 0} such that (fn)(f_n) converges in L1(R),{L^1(\mathbb{R}),} and all α>0{\alpha > 0} such that (fn)(f_n) converges in measure.

1/nαn0εfn

Figure 7. The drawing of Example 14: the function fn=(1/nα)χ[0,n],{f_n = (1/n^\alpha) \chi_{[0, n]},} the region under its graph, of area n1−α,{n^{1 - \alpha},} and the dashed level ε,{\varepsilon,} with the set {fn>ε}{\{ f_n > \varepsilon \}} hatched on the axis when it is not empty. The sliders set n,{n,} α\alpha and ε.{\varepsilon.}

For every x∈R{x \in \mathbb{R}} we have ∣fn(x)∣≤1/nα,{|f_n(x)| \le 1/n^\alpha,} which tends to 00 as nn grows, so fn→0{f_n \to 0} pointwise on R.{\mathbb{R}.} By the uniqueness of limits, Remark 12, if (fn)(f_n) converges in L1,{L^1,} it converges to 00 in L1.{L^1.} We compute

∥fn−0∥L1(R)=∫R∣fn∣ dλ=∫R1nαχ[0,n] dλ=1nα∫0ndλ=1nα n=n1−α.\begin{aligned} \|f_n - 0\|_{L^1(\mathbb{R})} &= \int_{\mathbb{R}} |f_n| \, d\lambda \\ &= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{1}{n^\alpha} \chi_{[0, n]} \, d\lambda = \frac{1}{n^\alpha} \int_0^n d\lambda \\ &= \frac{1}{n^\alpha} \, n = n^{1 - \alpha}. \end{aligned}

Notice that lim⁡n→∞∥fn∥L1=lim⁡n→∞n1−α,{\lim_{n \to \infty} \|f_n\|_{L^1} = \lim_{n \to \infty} n^{1 - \alpha},} which is 00 if and only if 1−α<0,{1 - \alpha < 0,} that is, if and only if α>1.{\alpha > 1.} Hence (fn)(f_n) converges in L1(R)L^1(\mathbb{R}) if and only if α>1.{\alpha > 1.}

Let ε>0.{\varepsilon > 0.} By the uniqueness of limits, if (fn)(f_n) converges in measure, it converges to 00 in measure, so it is enough to study λ({∣fn−0∣>ε})=λ({fn>ε}).{\lambda(\{ |f_n - 0| > \varepsilon \}) = \lambda(\{ f_n > \varepsilon \}).} There exists NεN_\varepsilon such that fn≤ε{f_n \le \varepsilon} for every n≥Nε,{n \ge N_\varepsilon,} because fn≤1/nα→0.{f_n \le 1/n^\alpha \to 0.} Hence {fn>ε}=∅{\{ f_n > \varepsilon \} = \emptyset} for every n≥Nε.{n \ge N_\varepsilon.}

Therefore λ({fn>ε})=λ(∅)=0{\lambda(\{ f_n > \varepsilon \}) = \lambda(\emptyset) = 0} for every n≥Nε,{n \ge N_\varepsilon,} and lim⁡nλ({fn>ε})=0.{\lim_n \lambda(\{ f_n > \varepsilon \}) = 0.} This holds for every α>0,{\alpha > 0,} hence fn→0{f_n \to 0} in measure on R\mathbb{R} for every α>0.{\alpha > 0.}

A sequence of functions on (2,+∞)(2, +\infty)

Example 15. On (2,+∞){(2, +\infty)} with the Lebesgue measure λ,{\lambda,} consider the functions fn≥0{f_n \ge 0} given by

fn(x)=n2+1n2(x2−2)+(n2+1)x,x∈(2,+∞).f_n(x) = \frac{n^2 + 1}{n^2 (x^2 - 2) + (n^2 + 1) x}, \qquad x \in (2, +\infty).

(1) What is the pointwise limit of the functions fnf_n of Example 15? For every x∈(2,+∞),{x \in (2, +\infty),}

fn(x)=n2(1+1/n2)n2(x2−2+x+x/n2)=1+1/n2x2−2+x+x/n2→n→∞1x2+x−2=1(x−1)(x+2)=:f(x),\begin{aligned} f_n(x) &= \frac{n^2 (1 + 1/n^2)}{n^2 (x^2 - 2 + x + x/n^2)} \\ &= \frac{1 + 1/n^2}{x^2 - 2 + x + x/n^2} \\ &\xrightarrow[n \to \infty]{} \frac{1}{x^2 + x - 2} = \frac{1}{(x - 1)(x + 2)} =: f(x), \end{aligned}

since 1/n2→0{1/n^2 \to 0} and x/n2→0.{x/n^2 \to 0.}

(2) Does (fn)(f_n) converge in L1((2,+∞))?{L^1((2, +\infty))?} We have

∣fn∣=fn=1+1/n2x2−2+x+x/n2≤2x2−2+x+0=2x2+x−2=:g(x),\begin{aligned} |f_n| = f_n &= \frac{1 + 1/n^2}{x^2 - 2 + x + x/n^2} \\ &\le \frac{2}{x^2 - 2 + x + 0} \\ &= \frac{2}{x^2 + x - 2} =: g(x), \end{aligned}

since 1/n2≤1{1/n^2 \le 1} and x/n2≥0.{x/n^2 \ge 0.} Moreover, g∈L1((2,+∞)),{g \in L^1((2, +\infty)),} since g(x)∼2/x2{g(x) \sim 2/x^2} as x→+∞.{x \to +\infty.} Hence, by the dominated convergence theorem, Theorem 8 with p=1,{p = 1,} fn→f{f_n \to f} in L1((2,+∞)).{L^1((2, +\infty)).}

(3) Compute lim⁡n∫2∞fn dλ.{\lim_n \int_2^\infty f_n \, d\lambda.}

Remark 16. Let (X,M,μ){(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)} be a measure space and let fn,f ⁣:X→R{f_n, f \colon X \to \mathbb{R}} be measurable, for every n.{n.} If fn→f{f_n \to f} in L1,{L^1,} then lim⁡n∫X∣fn∣ dμ=∫X∣f∣ dμ.{\lim_n \int_X |f_n| \, d\mu = \int_X |f| \, d\mu.}

By Remark 16, applied to the functions fn≥0{f_n \ge 0} and f≥0{f \ge 0} of (2),

lim⁡n→∞∫2∞fn dλ=∫2∞1(x−1)(x+2) dλ.\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_2^\infty f_n \, d\lambda = \int_2^\infty \frac{1}{(x - 1)(x + 2)} \, d\lambda.

Notice that f≥0{f \ge 0} and that ∣f∣=f{|f| = f} is integrable over (2,+∞)(2, +\infty) in the sense of the generalized Riemann integral. Hence, by (2) of Theorem 17 of the fifth post,

∫2∞1(x−1)(x+2) dλ=lim⁡R→∞∫2R1(x−1)(x+2) dx.\int_2^\infty \frac{1}{(x - 1)(x + 2)} \, d\lambda = \lim_{R \to \infty} \int_2^R \frac{1}{(x - 1)(x + 2)} \, dx.

Now

∫2R1(x−1)(x+2) dx=∫2R(1/3x−1+−1/3x+2) dx=13(log⁡∣x−1∣ ∣2R−log⁡∣x+2∣ ∣2R)=13(log⁡(R−1R+2)−log⁡1+log⁡4)=13log⁡4+13log⁡(R−1R+2),\begin{aligned} \int_2^R \frac{1}{(x - 1)(x + 2)} \, dx &= \int_2^R \Big( \frac{1/3}{x - 1} + \frac{-1/3}{x + 2} \Big) \, dx \\ &= \frac{1}{3} \Big( \log|x - 1| \, \Big|_2^R - \log|x + 2| \, \Big|_2^R \Big) \\ &= \frac{1}{3} \biggl( \log\Big( \frac{R - 1}{R + 2} \Big) - \log 1 + \log 4 \biggr) \\ &= \frac{1}{3} \log 4 + \frac{1}{3} \log\Big( \frac{R - 1}{R + 2} \Big), \end{aligned}

where log⁡1=0.{\log 1 = 0.} Therefore the limit in (3) is

∫2∞1(x−1)(x+2) dx=lim⁡R→∞(13log⁡4+13log⁡(R−1R+2))=13log⁡4.\begin{aligned} &\int_2^\infty \frac{1}{(x - 1)(x + 2)} \, dx \\ &\quad = \lim_{R \to \infty} \biggl( \frac{1}{3} \log 4 + \frac{1}{3} \log\Big( \frac{R - 1}{R + 2} \Big) \biggr) \\ &\quad = \frac{1}{3} \log 4. \end{aligned}