Theorem 3.5 of the previous post tells recurrent and transient states apart through the series of the probabilities pii(n). It is applied here to the study of random walks on Zd.
Let (Xn)n≥0 be a Markov chain with set of states Z and transition matrix
P=⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯q0⋯⋯0q⋯⋯p0⋯⋯0p⋯⋯00⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯,
where p,q∈(0,1) and p+q=1, as in Figure 1. The chain (Xn)n≥0 is irreducible and all its states have period 2.
Figure 1. The random walk on Z: from each state the walk jumps to the right with probability p and to the left with probability q.
We want to establish whether the states are recurrent or transient. For all n≥0 we compute
p00(2n)=(n2n)(pq)n.
Indeed, a path from 0 back to 0 in 2n steps makes n steps to the right and n to the left, in one of (n2n) orders, and each such path has probability (pq)n. By Stirling’s formula
where an≈bn means that an/bn→1. Since 0≤4pq=4p(1−p)≤1, with 4pq=1 if and only if p=q=1/2, and 4pq<1 otherwise, by Theorem 3.5 we deduce Proposition 4.1. Indeed, p00(n)=0 for odd n, so the series of Theorem 3.5 for the state 0 is the series of the p00(2n), which diverges when 4pq=1 and converges when 4pq<1; the chain is irreducible, so Corollary 3.6 extends the conclusion to all states.
Proposition 4.1. The following hold. (i) Symmetric random walk, p=q=1/2: all states are recurrent. (ii) Asymmetric random walk, p=q: all states are transient.
Figure 2. The return probabilities p00(2n) of the walk on Z for n=1,…,40, dots, and their asymptotic value (4pq)n/πn, line. The slider sets p, and q=1−p.
In the case p=q=1/2 the first return times Ti to a state i are almost surely finite. However, by means of the generating functions F00 and P00 introduced in the proof of Theorem 3.5, we can show that their expectation Ei[Ti] is infinite. In other words, the return to i is almost sure, but on average it occurs after a very long time.
Let us begin by recalling the Taylor series expansion
(1−4x)−21=n≥0∑(n2n)xn,∣x∣<41,
which gives an explicit formula for the generating function P00:
Indeed, the first equality holds because T0 is almost surely finite and P0{T0=n}=f00(n).Lemma 3.4 applies to the power series with coefficients nf00(n)≤n, whose radius of convergence is at least 1 and which is the derivative of F00 for ∣s∣<1.
Elementary computations show that, when d divides n, the maximum value is attained for
k1=k2=⋯=kd=dn.
In detail, if ka≥kb+2 for some a and b, moving one unit from ka to kb multiplies n!/(k1!⋯kd!) by ka/(kb+1)>1, so at the maximum the ki differ by at most 1, as in Figure 4. For the other n the bound below holds with (n/d)! read as Γ(n/d+1), since logΓ is convex and so k1!⋯kd!≥Γ(n/d+1)d by Jensen’s inequality.
Figure 4. An instance with d=3: the numbers n!/(k1!k2!k3!) over the triples with k1+k2+k3=n, one hexagon each, darker for larger values, and the largest ones outlined. The slider sets n.
By Stirling’s formula we find that (p00(2n))n≥0 is asymptotically smaller than a constant times
Since d≥3, the states are transient, because ∑n≥0p00(2n)<+∞.Figure 5 draws p00(2n) for d=1,2,3.
Figure 5. The return probabilities p00(2n) of the symmetric walks on Z,Z2 and Z3 for n=1,…,200, solid, on logarithmic scales. Dashed: 1/πn,1/(πn), and for d=3 the right-hand side of the last estimate.